{"id":1376,"date":"2010-01-17T09:01:55","date_gmt":"2010-01-17T17:01:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/new.wavewithoutashore.cwgservices.org\/?p=1376"},"modified":"2010-01-17T09:41:11","modified_gmt":"2010-01-17T17:41:11","slug":"figure-skating-nationals-page-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cherryh.com\/WaveWithoutAShore\/figure-skating-nationals-page-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Figure Skating Nationals&#8212;page 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>They&#8217;ve got an innovation on this year&#8217;s Nationals, which is a sound track I wish they&#8217;d put as an alternate to the commentary on every network: they handed out 4000 little radios with\u00a0a low, near monotone &#8216;call&#8217; of the moves, level, and points&#8230;including &#8216;count&#8217; on the sustained elements like spins and rotations&#8212;for instance, you have to sustain a spiral (lifted leg) 6 seconds for it to count: if the leg drops below your hip before that 6th second, no good. The lifts have grades of difficulty, and you have to do 3 full rotations; you can&#8217;t body-check your partner on the exit from the lift. On takeoff for a jump, you have to be on the &#8216;right&#8217; edge (inside or outside) for that particular jump, and the &#8216;call&#8217; will say &#8216;reviewed&#8217;, if something is deceptive and needs to be reviewed on tape. Cheating a jump, the famous &#8216;flutz&#8217; is starting a Lutz jump on the wrong edge, and a lot of American women are being hit hard on this one, because they got away with it young, and now are having to retrain.<\/p>\n<p>If this kind of &#8216;call&#8217; were available on general channels a lot of people would change their minds about the points being &#8216;arbitrary&#8217;. There&#8217;s a lot more going on and the announcer&#8217;s &#8216;beautiful!&#8217; doesn&#8217;t nearly cover it.<\/p>\n<p>Just a note: I&#8217;ve looked at the numbers, and have reached the conclusion there was no fudge on the numbers&#8212;everybody was getting rated a bit low. But in the system, if everybody is rated low, it still works.<\/p>\n<p>I really like hearing the &#8216;call&#8217;. It&#8217;s amazingly easy to keep up with. One choreographer really screwed his\/her skaters: they&#8217;re keeping with the music, but &#8216;shorting&#8217; 4 or 5 of their elements, incomplete turns, incomplete spirals, you name it. They should have had different music, or should not have &#8216;packed&#8217; their program. It does you no good at all to &#8216;pack&#8217; a program with elements, if you&#8217;re going to short most of them and get no credit. Doing fewer elements to perfection will get you more points. So the frequent charge that people are having to &#8216;pack&#8217; their programs I think doesn&#8217;t hold up. The plain mathematics of it says if you do that AND short your elements, you should not be getting credit. Period.<\/p>\n<p>You&#8217;ll also see long delays in the results coming out. If a skater has no or only one &#8216;reviewed&#8217; comment, the results come fairly fast. If a lot they&#8217;re doing is iffy and requires careful review, it takes much longer. They have to look at each of these moves on tape, and with a counter running to be sure they sustained the move long enough or FULLY completed the last revolution.<\/p>\n<p>If you want an analogy, try watching football or baseball with no markings on the field. That&#8217;s what it is to watch figure skating with no &#8216;call&#8217; . And that&#8217;s why, much as I love Dick and Scotty, I&#8217;d rather hear that monotone with the numbers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>They&#8217;ve got an innovation on this year&#8217;s Nationals, which is a sound track I wish they&#8217;d put as an alternate to the commentary on every network: they handed out 4000 little radios with\u00a0a low, near monotone &#8216;call&#8217; of the moves, level, and points&#8230;including &#8216;count&#8217; on the sustained elements like spins and rotations&#8212;for instance, you have [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":751,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[5],"class_list":["post-1376","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-journal","tag-figure-skating"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cherryh.com\/WaveWithoutAShore\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1376","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cherryh.com\/WaveWithoutAShore\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cherryh.com\/WaveWithoutAShore\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cherryh.com\/WaveWithoutAShore\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/751"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cherryh.com\/WaveWithoutAShore\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1376"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.cherryh.com\/WaveWithoutAShore\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1376\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cherryh.com\/WaveWithoutAShore\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1376"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cherryh.com\/WaveWithoutAShore\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1376"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cherryh.com\/WaveWithoutAShore\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1376"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}